The sign in question.

If you’ve spent any time on the Space Coast, you probably already know about the north end of Playalinda Beach. It’s one of those open secrets that locals shrug their shoulders when it is mentioned, often followed by a well-worn joke or two. Horror of horrors, the most northern area of the beach is unofficially a clothing-optional area, that is, a nude beach!


Talk of Titusville will always be free to access.
If you love what we’re doing, please consider becoming a monthly Supporter HERE.

Canaveral National Seashore spokesperson Laura Henning told Florida Today back in 2024 that the nude sunbathing at Playalinda is hardly a rumor. “It’s not rumors because if you go out there, you will see nude people,” she said plainly. “It’s been that way for decades.”

Indeed.

But this is all about a sign, not the beach. It doesn’t encourage anything — it’s simply a heads-up notice so that visitors, families included, aren’t surprised by what they might find at the north end of the beach. Practical stuff. Information parents can actually use.

So it raised more than a few eyebrows when it emerged that the informational signs at Canaveral that simply tell visitors they may encounter nude sunbathing ended up in a federal database of materials flagged for potential removal by the National Park Service. Is the AI hallucinating again?

Is our government worried that someone might be offended by a sign?

What’s The Kerfuffle?

Over the summer, National Park Service employees across the country were directed to submit signs, brochures, exhibits, and other materials for review under an executive order targeting anything that displays what the administration calls “improper partisan ideology,” a “false reconstruction of American history,” content that “inappropriately disparages Americans” or, finally, strays from themes of “beauty, grandeur and abundance” of the natural landscape.

The bulk of the deal with Civil War history, Black and Indigenous heritage, and climate change science, the usual political flash points. But scroll far enough through the spreadsheet, and you’ll find our little corner of Florida staring back at you: Playalinda Beach. For the ‘Clothing Optional’ warning sign.

Whether the sign survives the review remains to be seen. According to the implementation timeline, parks were to be notified of required changes in mid-August, with all “inappropriate content” removed or covered by early fall.

Sign or no sign, people will still head to the north end of Playalinda Beach, and leave with sunburnt private bits. It’s the au naturale order of things, I suppose.

Note: credit to SFGate for noticing this story first and giving me the idea to write my own.

Charles Boyer
Author: Charles Boyer

NASA kid from Cocoa Beach, FL, born of Project Apollo parents and family. I’m a writer and photographer sharing the story of spaceflight from the Eastern Range here in Florida.


12 responses to “Playalinda’s Warning Sign About The “Clothing Optional” Area Under Federal Scrutiny”

  1. There was a group of nudists that lived out there years before Cape Kennedy was established. I understand modesty, and the nudists that still go there respect the rights of those who don’t like being nude. It’s a well known phenomenon that the north end of the beach has been a clothing optional area. You don’t like it? Then don’t go to the north end of the beach. This is NOT a dedicated “gay” area, although I’m sure that people of that spectrum or sexuality probably go there, but that area is for anyone that enjoys being a naturalist (nudist). Leave them alone and avoid that area if it’s not something YOU approve of. Live and let live without imposing your personal beliefs on anyone else.

    1. I agree completely. If it’s not your thing, don’t go.

      I do think that the warning sign for unwitting tourists is a good idea, though. That way no one can say they weren’t warned.

  2. The sign indicates Parking Area 13 which is no longer the case since all parking areas north of Eddy Creek are closed. The “Nude Beach” is now Eddy Creek.

  3. Correction, lot 13 is open. Lot 8 is the current lot they are working on and as of yesterday is the only lot that is closed.

  4. I agree that sign is just a heads up for non nudist people to know what goes on lot 12 & 13.This shouldn’t be controversy about that sign

  5. Rose Ann Jones Avatar
    Rose Ann Jones

    The last time I was there I was laying out in a cop came along and told me that I needed to put my clothes on or I was going to get a $200 ticket and I have not been back since I think it’s a bunch of BS if it’s a nude beach prior to cops telling you to put your damn clothes on it’s none of their business they need to keep their nose to their self and quit bothering people when they are out there I used to go there all the time until that happened I didn’t have $200 and I wasn’t going to jail cuz I have never been to jail

    1. Rose Ann, what jurisdiction was the cop from? Was he from the city of Titusville, the Sherriff’s Dept or the the National Park Service? If an actual crime is committed here, I believe that NPS calls in the Sherriff’s Dept for assistance and any said arrestees go the the County jail. I don’t think this is within the City’s juridiction. I suppose, you can call the Brevard County State Attorneys Office and ask if they are actually prosecuting people for this. I think that if they do say “no”, you’d also best get the SAO’s name. I do think that state law is quite clear that public nudity is a crime. Now, that being said, I believe that said crime does not mean that exposure of the breasts specifically is a crime. The courts answered this in the 1990s that nudity means the sexual organs. And the courts ruled that breasts, per se, are not sexual. Personally, I think you’d be wise to avoid putting yourself in bad light regardless of the legalities and keep your clothes on. YMMV.

      1. A women’s “sexual organs” are internal so there is never a need for any clothing ever.

    2. Hi Rose Ann, I didn’t know you went out there. Kinda glad we never ran into each other out there. That would have been a bit akward lol

  6. I agree as well…we have enough imbalance and government control throughout our society. This is no different than attending your specific church or synagogue; that is, if the concept of a nude beach is not your thing, move on to what is!

  7. The sign might offend some people? I would think they would be more offended walking onto a nude beach with no warning. Bit thats just my opinion.
    I go there regularly. I did get in trouble once when I fell asleep and I … um.. became a human sundial. I was awoken by a ranger who advised me to either put my clothes back on, flip over or I would be arrested and fined. I apologized. Flipped over and told him It wasn’t intentional, and I can’t be held responsible for what happens while im sleeping. He told me yes I can be. So i make sure im well rested when I go now.

  8. I haven’t been to the “clothing optional” part of the beach since I was in my early 20’s (over 30 years ago). But how is that sign offensive? I don’t get it. It makes a simple statement about what you can expect. It’s no different than a sign saying “Warning, ocean has waves and currents”.

Leave a Reply

Trending

Discover more from TalkOfTitusville.com

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading