fbpx

Artemis-1 SLS Roll-Out slips to mid-January 2022

NASA Spaceflight – EGS, Jacobs, and the Orion and SLS teams are continuing testing and checkout of the vehicle, but the latest projections for the first rollout to Launch Pad 39B have moved from late-December 2021 to mid-January 2022.

Meanwhile, engineers are also troubleshooting a problem with a controller for one of the four RS-25 engines in the SLS Core Stage. The nature of the problem and the path to a resolution are still unknown and will need to be factored in, but current forecasts for when the vehicle will be ready to launch have moved from the end of January to mid-February.

When NASA’s Exploration Ground Systems (EGS) program and prime processing contractor Jacobs have configured the Artemis 1 Space Launch System (SLS) vehicle for launch day, they expect to have one-week periods to get the mission to the Moon off the ground. Between propellant consumption of the two liquid SLS stages and a 20-day long period where the range safety system is validated for use, up to three attempts could be conducted to tank the vehicle and launch within that week’s time before teams would have to stand down.

20-day clock on range safety flight termination system validation starts in the VAB

Talk of Titusville will always be free to access.
If you love what we’re doing, please consider becoming a monthly Supporter HERE.

Artemis 1 is the first launch for both the Exploration Ground Systems and Space Launch System programs within NASA’s Exploration Systems Development (ESD) human spaceflight division. For this first launch, SLS will propel an uncrewed Orion spacecraft to the Moon; together, the celestial mechanics and performance requirements for this specific mission define launch periods that repeat with opportunities to launch for about two weeks followed by about two weeks without opportunities.

While those requirements determine an overall window of opportunity for SLS to send Orion to the Moon, the launch processing teams at KSC are also working with their own operational requirements. EGS and Jacobs will be working to line up their operational clocks with the lunar launch periods.

For Artemis 1, they are working within operational constraints to have the vehicle and ground infrastructure ready to make launch attempts during a seven-day stretch within the overall 10-15 day lunar launch periods of opportunity. After the celestial mechanics constraints, there is an operational constraint on the length of time the range safety flight termination system (FTS) on the vehicle is valid for use.

“There’s an end-to-end [functional] test that the [Eastern Test Range] requires you have in essentially a flight configuration,” Jeff Spaulding, Senior NASA Test Director (NTD) who will serve as the Lead NTD for the Artemis 1 launch, said in a November 29 interview with NASASpaceflight. “When I say ‘flight configuration,’ I mean flight batteries installed and all of your systems up and processing — flight codes, the whole bit, right?”

Credit: NASA/Radislav Sinyak.

“The requirement says that once you do the flight termination system end-to-end test, that final flight configuration test with flight batteries, etcetera, you need to have launched within 20 days or you need to re-perform that test. That gives [range safety] confidence that your system is still functioning nominally [and] there’s been no changes [to the configuration]. So that’s a requirement that we have to meet to fly off the range.”

“That 20-day requirement is the tailored requirement that we worked with the range because this was a new vehicle and we knew that it was going to take us a little bit more than what they nominally expected — but certainly not outside the realm of where we are,” Spaulding added.

The flight termination system operates independently from the rocket since it needs to be able to function whether or not the rocket is functioning. Part of configuring the FTS for flight and preparing for the test is installing the batteries; the batteries have their own limit, though it is longer. “There’s a battery life constraint on when we activate the batteries — that’s 90 days [of] ‘wet life’ from the time they’re activated until they need to be changed out again,” Spaulding also noted.

The 20 days that the FTS is validated for launch attempts is the more constraining of the two clocks. The end-to-end test that validates the FTS and starts the 20-day clock has to be performed in the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) because it requires access inside the SLS vehicle; EGS and Jacobs then need to complete the remaining pre-launch preparations in the VAB and at the launch pad.

Within the approximately three-week period (20 days) where the FTS is valid for launch use, the final VAB preps for launch take about a week, and preps at the pad for launch (including the countdown) take about another week, which will leave about a week left to carry out tankings and launch attempts. “Once you do that [FTS end-to-end] test, from that point until [we are] ready for launch right now is about 13 days,” Spaulding explained.

Final assembly of the Artemis 1 vehicle was completed in late October, and EGS and Jacobs are conducting several weeks of integrated vehicle checkouts in parallel with the beginning of final servicing and pre-launch vehicle closeouts. During tests in November, one of the redundant computers in the RS-25 engine controller for engine 4 would no longer power up correctly.

Talk of Titusville will always be free to access.
If you love what we’re doing, please consider becoming a monthly Supporter HERE.

The control units are the major component that was upgraded between use of the engines on the final Space Shuttle missions and adaptation of the existing Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME) Block II design for use on SLS . The new RS-25 engine controller units for SLS still employ two redundant digital computer units (DCUs) that operate on independent control channels, A and B.

RS-25 prime contractor Aerojet Rocketdyne and the SLS Program have been troubleshooting the controller problem with EGS and Jacobs since prior to the Thanksgiving holiday. A problem resolution team continues to evaluate test data and consider forward options, but so far no conclusions or decisions have been reported and it is uncertain what the impact will be to the schedule.

The controller unit is a replaceable item, and remove and replace operations for controllers were carried out on engines installed in Shuttle orbiters while stacked in their vertical, launch orientation during that program; however, it is uncertain whether a controller replacement is possible “in-place” on an SLS Core Stage.

Impacts to the schedule remain uncertain from the additional time required to resolve the engine controller problem. Ground support equipment for vertical engine installations was also reportedly moved into the VAB last week, but NASA indicated on December 2 that an engine replacement was not an option on the table at that time.

Although troubleshooting impacts are uncertain, schedule projections are currently forecasting that rollout of the vehicle from the VAB to Launch Pad 39B would be no sooner than mid-January 2022 with final launch readiness now no sooner than mid-February. Earlier forecasts had placed launch readiness at the very end of January, just outside the end of a launch period where SLS could place Orion on a trans-lunar trajectory.

Launch readiness is an estimate of when all pre-launch preparations can be completed and is less certain for this first launch campaign than calculations of vehicle performance or the position of the Moon. When the pre-launch work reaches points such as the time-critical FTS end-to-end test, then the schedule will have to be aligned with a lunar launch period; however, with several weeks of testing and closeouts still remaining, projections of a time-frame for launch readiness will move between and through the recurring launch periods.

The current mid-February forecast for launch readiness would more or less line up with the opening of Launch Period 18 on February 12; the Exploration division programs had already tentatively targeted the February launch period to line up their final readiness review calendar.

The launch periods are generally available for durations of between 10 to 15 days, so there’s less margin than before to make the February launch period, which closes on February 27. The next opportunity, Launch Period 19, opens on March 12.

SLS stages’ liquid hydrogen requirements close to limits of available launch pad capacity

Within the seven-day period of launch opportunities expected within the remainder of the FTS clock, the currently available storage of liquid hydrogen (LH2) and liquid oxygen (LOX) propellant at Launch Pad 39B for the two SLS stages limits the number of tankings that can be made.

“For Artemis 1, we have the old hydrogen and oxygen spheres out at 39B, and we know that we can have three attemps over a seven day period, strictly based on commodities,” Mike Sarafin, NASA’s Artemis 1 Mission Manager, said in a September interview with NASASpaceflight.

In a November 2018 tour of Launch Pad 39B, NASA Pad Operations Manager Ken Ford said that the two LH2-LOX stages in the SLS Block 1 vehicle could use up to 730,000 gallons of liquid hydrogen on the day of a launch attempt. Ford said that the current hydrogen sphere can hold up to 850,000 gallons of LH2, of which 765,000 gallons is available to support a launch. That’s enough for a single launch attempt but not enough to support another the next day.

The usage includes not just the time it takes to load propellants into the tanks of the two stages, but the time required to thermally condition the loaded propellant and propulsion system equipment for ignition and then up to another two hours of launch window hold time after that. While the vehicle is filled with liquid propellant, some of the LH2 is consumed for engine conditioning, and some boils off and needs to be replenished. If a launch attempt were to be scrubbed after waiting through an entire two-hour launch window, and the propellant in the tanks was drained back into the spheres, they would end up being about 280,000 gallons short of the LH2 needed for another attempt.

That deficit would be smaller for attempts that are scrubbed before using up the full two-hour hold time, but in case of a scrub on the first Artemis 1 attempt, a 48-hour turnaround would be required.

“That assumes that you tanked, that you scrubbed in your window while you were fully tanked, and then had to detank, and then we would actually have to do a little bit of hydrogen top off using tankers to achieve the next attempt 48 hours later. And then, assuming that we tanked on that one and then scrubbed after we were fully tanked, we would have a third attempt after 72 hours because we would have to replenish both hydrogen and oxygen out at the pad. So we could get three attempts in seven days with [that] replenishment plan.”

“Because this vehicle is so big and we use so much liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen [in both the Core Stage and ICPS], it takes a while to reconfigure and set up for the next attempt,” Sarafin added. “So we’re preserving the option for a next attempt after a certain amount of time by creating a maximum of a hundred and twenty-minute window.”

In between launch attempts for Artemis 1, tanker trucks will bring in more supplies of liquid hydrogen to augment the remaining commodities in the sphere. NASA already uses tanker trucks to replenish cryogenic boiloff in the spheres at the pad, bringing them in from their vendor; in order to expedite replenishing the LH2 sphere, the agency has contracted with ULA to take LH2 stored in the hydrogen storage sphere at Launch Pad 37B that currently supports Delta IV launch operations.

Post Author

Leave a Reply